🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.